Zoom vs Microsoft Teams vs Google Meet: Price and Features

For most people the choice comes down to this: Zoom still offers the longest meetings and the most generous participant caps outside a paid bundle, Microsoft Teams is the default pick once you're already paying for Microsoft 365, and Google Meet is the easiest to join and the cheapest way to add solid AI notes if you live in Google Workspace. Below is how the three stack up on price, limits, AI features, and integrations for 2026.

Pricing at a glance

All three platforms follow the same shape: a free tier capped at roughly an hour of group calling, then paid tiers that unlock longer meetings, bigger participant counts, cloud recording, and AI note-taking. Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet remain the three most widely used dedicated meeting platforms worldwide, each tied to a different core business — standalone video, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace respectively. Here's how the entry-level paid plans compare directly, based on Zoom's own pricing page, Microsoft's Teams limits documentation, and Google Workspace's pricing page.

Two things stand out immediately. First, Zoom's paid tiers still allow the longest single meeting (30 hours) at the lowest participant tier (100 people) without needing a separate business suite — you can buy just a Zoom Pro seat and nothing else. Second, Microsoft and Google both tie their best Meet/Teams limits to a wider productivity bundle (Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace), so the "per-user" price buys email, storage, and office apps too, not just video calling.

Zoom pricing and features

Zoom's free Basic plan still caps group meetings (three or more participants) at 40 minutes, with up to 100 participants and a very limited slice of AI Companion — three meeting summaries, 20 AI queries, and three "My Notes" uses per month. Paid tiers remove the time cap almost entirely:

• Pro — $16.99/month billed monthly, or $14.16/month billed annually. Meetings run up to 30 hours, with a 100-participant cap, unlimited AI Companion summaries and queries, and agentic search across past meetings.
• Business — $21.99/month monthly, $18.33/month annually. Participant cap rises to 300, and AI Companion adds unlimited note-taking plus an AI whiteboard assistant.
• Enterprise — custom pricing, 1,000-participant cap, same 30-hour meeting length, with the full AI Companion suite and added compliance and security tooling.

Because Zoom is sold as a dedicated meetings product rather than bundled into a broader office suite, it's the simplest option if video is literally all you need and you don't want to migrate email or files anywhere.

Microsoft Teams pricing and features

Teams comes in three flavors, as Microsoft's own plan comparison page lays out: the free personal version, a $4-ish standalone "Essentials" SKU for small teams that don't want full Microsoft 365, and the version bundled into Microsoft 365 Business and Enterprise plans that most companies actually run.

Per Microsoft's own limits documentation, Teams Free, Business Basic, Business Standard, Business Premium, and Teams Essentials all cap meetings at 300 participants; the limit only rises to 1,000 on Microsoft 365 F3/E3/E5/A3/A5/G3/G5-class plans. Meetings and events across every paid tier run up to 30 hours, while locally-stored recordings are capped at 4 hours or 1.5GB before automatically restarting. As of the July 2026 price update, Microsoft 365 Business Basic lists at $7/user/month, Business Standard at $14, and Business Premium at $22 — all unchanged or increased from prior pricing, with Premium holding steady.

AI is where Teams gets more layered than Zoom or Meet. Copilot Chat is included at no extra cost in the Business tiers, but the features most people want — automatic "Intelligent Recap" after every meeting, branded meeting rooms, and advanced meeting protection — sit behind the Teams Premium add-on, priced around $7–$10/user/month depending on commitment term. For interactive, ask-it-anything AI inside a live meeting, you need the full Microsoft 365 Copilot add-on, which lists separately at $30/user/month. It's worth comparing Teams against Microsoft's own productivity suite before buying, since Teams' value is tightly coupled to the rest of Microsoft 365 versus Google Workspace as a package rather than standing alone.

Google Meet pricing and features

Google Meet's free tier (any Google Account) allows up to 100 participants with a 60-minute cap on group calls; one-on-one and mobile calls are unlimited. There's no built-in recording or AI assistance on the free tier.

Paid Meet features arrive through Google Workspace:

• Business Starter — $7/user/month (around $5.60/month with an annual commitment). Meetings run up to 24 hours with a 100-participant cap, but no cloud recording and only limited Gemini access.
• Business Standard — $14/user/month ($11.20 annual). Participant cap rises to 150, recordings save to Drive, and Gemini's "take notes for me" automated summaries are included, along with Studio Sound noise cancellation.
• Business Plus — $22/user/month ($17.60 annual). Participant cap jumps to 500, with the same 24-hour meeting length and full recording/Gemini access.
• Enterprise — custom pricing, 1,000-participant cap, same 24-hour limit, plus the most complete Gemini and admin controls.

Google's AI pitch for Meet centers on Gemini generating notes and a recap automatically, real-time translated captions, and Studio Sound/Studio Look, aimed at making a meeting watchable and summarizable without anyone touching a third-party bot. Teams considering Meet instead of standalone email or storage tools should also weigh it against the Proton Mail vs Gmail comparison, since Meet's value is largely a function of whether you're already in the Google ecosystem.

Participant and meeting-length limits compared

If raw capacity is your deciding factor, the pattern is consistent across all three: free tiers hover around 100 participants and 40–60 minutes, paid small-business tiers extend meeting length dramatically (24–30 hours) while keeping participant counts between 100 and 300, and only enterprise-grade plans unlock 500–1,000 participants. Zoom's 30-hour cap and Teams' 30-hour cap both beat Meet's 24-hour ceiling, though in practice almost no real meeting runs anywhere close to any of these limits — they mostly exist to stop a single license being used to run a 24/7 "always-on" room.

One practical nuance: Zoom and Teams measure meeting length as a single continuous session limit, while Google's 24-hour figure applies per workspace tier regardless of whether attendees are internal or external. None of the three charges extra for dial-in participants beyond standard telephony add-on fees.

AI transcription and summaries compared

All three vendors now treat live transcription and auto-generated summaries as a baseline expectation rather than a premium extra — the differentiation is in how much you get for free versus how much requires an add-on:

• Zoom AI Companion is bundled into every paid plan (Pro and up) with unlimited summaries, in-meeting Q&A, and smart chapters; the free Basic plan gets a token three summaries a month.
• Microsoft Teams splits AI into two products: Copilot Chat ships free in Business tiers for basic help, while the automatic post-meeting recap and advanced features require Teams Premium, and a fully interactive meeting assistant requires the pricier Microsoft 365 Copilot add-on.
• Google Meet folds Gemini-powered note-taking directly into Business Standard and above, with no separate AI add-on fee at that tier — arguably the most straightforward AI-for-the-price proposition of the three, though it lags the agentic, cross-app automation Zoom and Microsoft are building toward.

For organizations already comparing AI-assisted productivity tools more broadly, it's worth reading up on how these meeting assistants fit alongside another productivity-tool comparison covering AI browsers, since many teams are now stacking multiple AI layers across meetings, email, and browsing rather than picking just one vendor's assistant.

Integrations compared

Zoom integrates broadly across both ecosystems and third parties: Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Calendar, Outlook, and a large app marketplace, since it has no competing productivity suite of its own to protect. Microsoft Teams integrates most deeply with anything already inside Microsoft 365 — SharePoint, OneDrive, Planner, Outlook calendars, and Power Platform automations — making it the stickiest option for organizations standardized on Microsoft tooling, though third-party integrations exist via its own app store too. Google Meet is tightest with Google Workspace itself (Calendar, Gmail, Drive, Chat) and increasingly with Gemini across those same apps, but has a thinner third-party marketplace than Zoom or Teams. If your team is also weighing where files should live, that decision usually tracks closely with the video platform choice, since storage and meetings tend to be bundled by the same vendor.

Which is best for individuals and freelancers

For solo use or informal calls, cost usually wins: both Zoom Basic and Google Meet's free tier cover 100 participants, and Meet has the edge for anyone already living in Gmail and Google Calendar since a meeting link can be dropped straight into an event with zero extra setup. Zoom's 40-minute cap (versus Meet's 60 minutes) is the one real downside for longer free calls — a client call that runs past 40 minutes on Zoom Basic gets cut off, while Meet gives you an extra 20 minutes of runway. Teams Free exists but is the least commonly used of the three for pure individual use outside organizations already on Microsoft accounts.

Which is best for small business

This is the closest three-way race. Zoom Pro ($14.16–$16.99/user/month) is the cheapest way to get unlimited-feeling (30-hour) meetings with full AI summaries and no other commitments. Google Workspace Business Standard ($14/user/month) matches that price while adding Gmail, Drive storage, and Gemini note-taking — a better deal if you need email and file storage anyway, since you're not paying twice. Microsoft 365 Business Standard, also $14/user/month, is the strongest pick if your team already runs Office apps day to day, though the best AI meeting features (automatic recap) require the Teams Premium add-on on top. In short: pick Zoom if video is the product you need; pick Workspace or Microsoft 365 if you need the whole office suite and video is one piece of it.

Which is best for enterprise

At enterprise scale, Microsoft Teams typically wins by default for organizations already standardized on Microsoft 365 E3/E5 — not because its meeting features are categorically better, but because Teams is already paid for as part of the license, integrates with Entra ID and Purview compliance tooling, and raises the participant cap to 1,000 without a separate purchase. Zoom Enterprise remains competitive for organizations that run video as a dedicated, cross-platform service (useful for companies with mixed Google/Microsoft environments, or heavy external-partner meetings) and matches the 1,000-participant ceiling with a simpler, single-purpose product. Google Workspace Enterprise with Meet is the strongest pick for enterprises that have already standardized on Google Workspace for email and docs, with the same 1,000-participant cap and the deepest Gemini integration across Docs, Sheets, and Meet together.

Bottom line

There's no single winner across all three audiences, because each vendor's video conferencing tool is priced and packaged around a different core product: Zoom around video itself, Microsoft Teams around Microsoft 365, and Google Meet around Google Workspace. If you need the longest meetings and biggest participant counts at the lowest standalone price, Zoom's Pro and Business tiers are hard to beat. If you're already paying for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, the video conferencing tool bundled into that suite is almost always the more economical choice over adding Zoom on top — the only real question is whether you want the extra AI recap and security features enough to pay for Teams Premium or Copilot. For most small teams starting from zero, matching your video platform to whichever email and storage ecosystem you're already committed to will save more money than optimizing the video tool in isolation.

Written byFelix Moreau

Felix Moreau writes Pandromeda's software coverage and how-to guides. He covers Windows, macOS and Linux updates, the apps people rely on, emulators and developer tools, and turns official documentation into clear, numbered steps that work on the current version.

More from Felix MoreauAll Software & Guides coverage